You are here
Access Management in Tennessee
Abstract:
Marshall Elizer
Tanisha Hall
Tennessee DOT
Overview
- Purpose of Tennessees Corridor Management Project
- Project Overview & Process
- The Selected Tool: Corridor Management Agreements (CMAs)
- Reactions-to-Date & Next Steps
Remaining Challenges:
- Explaining CMAs to key stakeholders
- Getting CMAs approved
- Implementing the CMAs
- Establishing long-lasting partnerships and processes immune to local and state political changes
Slide List:
- Access Management in Tennessee
- Overview
- Project Purpose
- Project Leadership
- Local Stakeholders
- Other Invited Stakeholders
- Project Vision and Key Goals
- Project Objectives
- Why Coordinate
- Transportation and Land Use?
- Poor Coordination Creates
- Benefits of Transportation and Land Use Coordination
- Our First Step
- Selecting Pilot Corridors
- Pilot Corridor Local Agencies
- Pilot Corridors
- Next Step - A Symposium
- Symposium in Sept. 2010
- Project Website Created
- SR 109 Corridor - Workshop #1
- Government Stakeholders
- Selected Corridor Goals
- Selected Corridor Strategies
- Access Management
- Land Use Planning
- Roadway Design & Capacity
- Traffic Management
- & Operations
- SR 60 Corridor - Workshop #1
- Government Stakeholders
- Selected Corridor Goals
- Selected Corridor Strategies
- Access Management
- Land Use Planning
- Roadway Design & Capacity
- Corridor Workshop #2
- What is a Corridor
- Management Agreement (CMA)?
- Levels of CMAs
- Many Types of CMAs
- Key Components
- Key Sections of a CMA
- CMAs CAN address many elements
- Example: SR 109 Agreement
- SR 109 General Action Plan
- Agreement Access Management
- Specific Action Plan
- Agreement Land Use
- Specific Action Plan
- Agreement Roadway Design & Capacity
- Specific Action Plan
- Agreement Traffic M & O
- Specific Action Plan
- Governance
- Posted on: Fri, 08/30/2013 - 23:11
- By: fbroen
up
0 users have voted.
Click here if you liked this information
Primary Links: